my gucci bag, my malawi child
there are some things you read about in the news, and you shake your head, think *the world has gone mad*, and forget about it. then there are news that make your blood boil and you get really REALLY mad. for me, it was not the news about the extended congestion charge zone in london that did it, but the story of madonna buying a child in malawi.
madonna - baby trafficker. a one-year old baby, not an orphan at all because his father is alive and well, was taken out of his community in malawi, away from his family, and delivered to mrs celebrity in a private plane. madonna's publicist claims she adopted the little boy to help one child escape poverty. wrong. first of all, there was no adoption. in order to adopt a child, social services need to be involved, you have to go through lengthy application and scanning processes that can take years, especially in international adoptions. and in this case i believe but am not sure, malawi law forbids foreign adoptions altogether. madonna purchased this baby just like she'd purchase a gucci handbag. by paying lots of money through middle men and wait for the delivery. unless of course malawi would sell anything if the price is right, even their own children. children are, as we know, the future of a country. no government should be blinded by the fact that they have the cds of that person who they are allowing to steal a child from their country.
madonna - politically correct racist. if madonna wants to help this baby escape poverty, she can support his entire home village from afar. or help one of the many poor children in britain or the us. her self-righteous statement is pure pr bullshit. i did not believe angelina jolie, and i don't believe madonna. rather, this is a text book example of 21st-century colonialism. the rich, white 50-year old woman, who already has 2 children of her own, wants a new toy. madonna has nothing to teach this boy except how to be selfish. she is a bully who is obviously used to getting what she wants. she does not think much. african babies are the new status symbol in celebrity land i fear. the cuter and browner the baby, the better. unfortunately, madonna is a role model to some equally dumb, selfish women, therefore i have horror visions of hoards of middle-class, middle-aged women ordering an african baby as if it was the latest fashion accessory. *to help them escape poverty.* how cute. and they can all claim that we live in a democracy, and what is allowed to madonna should not be denied mrs rhys-jones from sussex.
what's shocking is the silence of the media and child support agencies. how can any one individual steal a baby under the watchful eye of millions of people, governments and institutions, and get away with it? that's my question. does anyone out there have an answer?
i am angry. the world should stop this baby delivery service now. take that little boy from malawi back home. and take madonna and all others involved to court for what they did: baby kidnapping and trafficking!
in the meantime, i'd like to see what happens when chinese millionaires start *adopting* sweet little gingerhaired babies from, say, the rough neighbourhoods of glasgow.
staying on the case - schnuckelchen.
madonna - baby trafficker. a one-year old baby, not an orphan at all because his father is alive and well, was taken out of his community in malawi, away from his family, and delivered to mrs celebrity in a private plane. madonna's publicist claims she adopted the little boy to help one child escape poverty. wrong. first of all, there was no adoption. in order to adopt a child, social services need to be involved, you have to go through lengthy application and scanning processes that can take years, especially in international adoptions. and in this case i believe but am not sure, malawi law forbids foreign adoptions altogether. madonna purchased this baby just like she'd purchase a gucci handbag. by paying lots of money through middle men and wait for the delivery. unless of course malawi would sell anything if the price is right, even their own children. children are, as we know, the future of a country. no government should be blinded by the fact that they have the cds of that person who they are allowing to steal a child from their country.
madonna - politically correct racist. if madonna wants to help this baby escape poverty, she can support his entire home village from afar. or help one of the many poor children in britain or the us. her self-righteous statement is pure pr bullshit. i did not believe angelina jolie, and i don't believe madonna. rather, this is a text book example of 21st-century colonialism. the rich, white 50-year old woman, who already has 2 children of her own, wants a new toy. madonna has nothing to teach this boy except how to be selfish. she is a bully who is obviously used to getting what she wants. she does not think much. african babies are the new status symbol in celebrity land i fear. the cuter and browner the baby, the better. unfortunately, madonna is a role model to some equally dumb, selfish women, therefore i have horror visions of hoards of middle-class, middle-aged women ordering an african baby as if it was the latest fashion accessory. *to help them escape poverty.* how cute. and they can all claim that we live in a democracy, and what is allowed to madonna should not be denied mrs rhys-jones from sussex.
what's shocking is the silence of the media and child support agencies. how can any one individual steal a baby under the watchful eye of millions of people, governments and institutions, and get away with it? that's my question. does anyone out there have an answer?
i am angry. the world should stop this baby delivery service now. take that little boy from malawi back home. and take madonna and all others involved to court for what they did: baby kidnapping and trafficking!
in the meantime, i'd like to see what happens when chinese millionaires start *adopting* sweet little gingerhaired babies from, say, the rough neighbourhoods of glasgow.
staying on the case - schnuckelchen.
posted by SCHNUCKELCHEN at 7:06 pm
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home